Prime Business Africa
Nigeria’s Value Added Tax (VAT) system has come under scrutiny as data reveals the South-East region received ₦341.46 billion in VAT allocations in 2024, despite contributing only ₦101.09 billion – a 337.8% return.
Former Aviation Minister and Corps Marshal of the Federal. Road Safety Commission (FRSC), Mr Osita Chidoka, clarifies that VAT allocation is paid to states, not ethnic groups or traders, emphasizing that the system rewards states with robust economic structures and formalized transactions.
On a post he made on his WhatsApp Channel which was replicated on other social media platforms, Chidoka gave a breakdown of VAT contributions and allocations for 2024 showing:
Join our WhatsApp ChannelSouth-West: Contributed ₦3.11 trillion, received ₦849.71 billion (27%)
South-South: Contributed ₦1.08 trillion, received ₦543.49 billion (50%)
North-West: Contributed ₦211.27 billion, received ₦574.32 billion (272%)
North-East: Contributed ₦174.50 billion, received ₦411.84 billion (236%)
South-East: Contributed ₦101.09 billion, received ₦341.46 billion (338%)
The former House of Representatives Member argues that the current system highlights Nigeria’s narrow production base and fragile economy, rather than regional dominance. Proposed VAT reforms may shift allocations, favoring regions with strong production and formal consumption.
READ ALSO: Chidoka Family Pays 530 Students’ School Fees In Anambra
Full Text of Chidoka’s Submission Below:
VAT DOES NOT FOLLOW THE TRADER. IT FOLLOWS THE STATE.
I’ve read the many reactions to my last post and I’m encouraged by the level of engagement and the quality of some of the arguments. This is a serious issue and it deserves serious thinking.
One pushback keeps recurring:
“Igbos are everywhere; they make money everywhere; so VAT data is unfair.”
Let’s clarify this important, valid but inapplicable point:
Even if a South-Easterner creates value in Kano, Kaduna, Lagos, or Port Harcourt, VAT is recorded where the transaction is formalised and remitted — and VAT allocation is paid to STATES, not ethnic groups.
VAT does not measure origin, ethnicity, or ownership of capital. It measures where value is booked, captured, and taxed.
So the real question is not who hustles where, but which states build systems that formalise, capture, and scale economic activity.
Now, to the numbers.
1) The South-East still receives far more than it contributes
In 2024, the South-East contributed ₦101.09bn to VAT but received ₦341.46bn — a 337.8% return.
That ₦341.46bn did not go to “Igbo traders in Lagos” or “Igbo businesses in Kano”.
It went to Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo — the South-East states.
So when people say “our people are contributing everywhere”, my response is simple: VAT does not track people. It tracks states.
And by that measure, the South-East is a net beneficiary of redistribution. That is not an insult; it is a policy fact.
2) This is not a South-East problem alone
In 2024:
South-West contributed ₦3.11trn, received ₦849.71bn (≈27%)
South-South contributed ₦1.08trn, received ₦543.49bn (≈50%)
North-West contributed ₦211.27bn, received ₦574.32bn (≈272%)
North-East contributed ₦174.50bn, received ₦411.84bn (≈236%)
North-Central (states) contributed ₦154.54bn, received ₦408.66bn (≈265%)
South-East contributed ₦101.09bn, received ₦341.46bn (≈338%)
This shows that Nigeria’s VAT system redistributes heavily from a few high-production zones to all others, with every zone outside the South-West and South-South receiving far more than it contributes.
This is a clear sign of a narrow, fragile production base, not regional dominance, hence, a Nigeria production failure, not a regional superiority contest.
And it gets starker under the proposed VAT reform.
If we apply the new distribution formula of 60% derivation, 20% equality and 20% population to 2024 VAT distribution it would have lifted
South-West receipts from about ₦850bn to over ₦2.0trn,
South-South from about ₦540bn to roughly ₦850bn
While cutting South-East receipts from about ₦340bn to roughly ₦220bn.
North-West would dip modestly, cushioned by population, while North-Central (outside the FCT) would fall more sharply once redistribution thins.
The exact figures will shift as VAT begins to follow consumption rather than headquarters — but the direction is clear: production and formal consumption will matter more than redistribution.
Maybe the “restructuring” or “true federalism” many clamour for is finally upon us without drama.
3) “VAT doesn’t capture informality” — exactly
Many South-East businesses operate informally or under-report. That is not an argument against the data; it is the diagnosis.
An economy that is vibrant but informal is not strong.
It cannot fund infrastructure, build industrial depth, or defend itself fiscally.
4) Final word
Let’s stop mixing three debates:
Igbo enterprise across Nigeria is real.
South-East state economies are structurally weak in hosting large, formal, scalable production.
VAT allocation is paid to states, not to where “our people” live or trade.
If we want the South-East to move from net beneficiary to net contributor, the path is industrialisation, power, logistics, security, and formalisation.
Presence is not production.
Trading is not industrialisation.
And VAT does not reward identity — it rewards structure.
I’m grateful for the robust engagement and the serious intellectual contributions.
This is my final word on this thread.
Osita Chidoka
14 January 2026
