Elon Musk Loses As Delaware Judge Voids $55bn Tesla Compensation Package 

January 31, 2024
US Presidential Debate: Elon Musk Praises CNN For Non-Partisanship
U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. -- Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk speaks with Lt. Gen. Richard Clark, Superintendent of the U.S. Air Force Academy, during the Ira C. Eaker Distinguished Speaker Presentation in the Academy's Arnold Hall on April 7, 2022 in Colorado Springs, Colo. (U.S. Air Force photo by Trevor cokley)

Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick ruled on Tuesday that Tesla CEO Elon Musk is not entitled to the landmark compensation package awarded by the company’s board of directors, potentially worth over $55 billion.

The ruling follows a shareholder lawsuit that accused Musk and Tesla directors of breaching their duties, resulting in a waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment for Musk.

Join our WhatsApp Channel

Chancellor McCormick, in a 200-page decision, emphasized that Musk’s extensive ties with key negotiators, including compensation committee chairman Ira Ehrenpreis and committee member Antonio Gracias, raised concerns about a fair negotiation process. The judge also noted the involvement of Musk’s former divorced attorney, Todd Maron, as a primary go-between in the working group developing the pay package.

READ ALSO: Elon Musk Closes Year With $92bn Earnings, Leads World Richest Billionaires

Reacting on X (formerly Twitter), Musk offered business advice, saying: “Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware” and recommended Nevada or Texas for incorporation if shareholders prefer decision-making authority.

This ruling comes as Musk, currently the world’s richest person, had challenged Tesla’s board to devise a new compensation plan, aiming for a 25% stake in the company. Despite Musk’s denial of dictating the terms during trial testimony in November 2022, Chancellor McCormick concluded that, as a controlling shareholder with a potential conflict of interest, the approval process was deeply flawed.

Greg Varallo, lead attorney for the shareholder plaintiff, praised the decision, calling the initially proposed pay package “absurdly outsized.” Analysts, including Dan Ives from Wedbush Securities, expressed astonishment at the unprecedented ruling, emphasizing its significant impact on Tesla and Musk.

The voided compensation package was contingent on Tesla meeting market capitalization and operational milestones, with Musk standing to gain $55.8 billion if the company achieved a market capitalization of $650 billion within a decade.

Despite Tesla’s success in meeting milestones, the judge deemed the process leading to approval as unfair, ultimately calling for the recall of Musk’s compensation.

Emmanuel Ochayi
+ posts

Featured Stories

Latest from World News

CAR Court Sentences European NGO Worker to 10 Years for Espionage

The Court of Appeal in Bangui, capital of the Central African Republic (CAR), has sentenced Martin Joseph Figueira, a Belgian-Portuguese employee of U.S.-based humanitarian organisation FHI 360, to 10 years of hard labour after convicting him of espionage and multiple state-security offences.
CBN, Foreign Airlines Differ On $700m Trapped Fund
Previous Story

CBN, Foreign Airlines Differ On $700m Trapped Fund

Israel Vows To Retaliate Against Iran Over Missile Attack
Next Story

Israeli Forces Eliminate 3 Palestine Militants In Jenin Hospital Amid Rising West Bank Tensions

Don't Miss

Alleged N1.4bn Oil Subsidy Fraud

Alleged N1.4bn Oil Subsidy Fraud: Court Admits More Evidence Against Nadabo Energy Boss

 The ongoing trial of Abubakar Ali Peters and his company,
Farmers in Nigeria

Food Insecurity: Nigeria among 45 countries in need of assistance – FAO

Nigeria is among 45 countries in need of external assistance