Peter Okoye, PBA Journalism MenteeRenaissance Network Africa (RNA) and Dr Adah Edache Obekpa have filed a suit against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Federal Government of Nigeria over alleged copyright violation on the introduction of electronic voting (E-voting) in Nigeria’s political system.
Obekpa and RNA approached the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court (FHC) for redress in Suit No FHC/ABJ/CS/391/2023 now before Justice I. E. Ekwo of Court No. 7.
In the said suit filed by their lawyer, Jonathan Akeme, Esq, they are praying the court to order INEC and FGN to compensate them in the sum of N77 billion for their novel and innovative I-voting proposal, which according to them, gave birth to the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) and IReV, and to be publicly recognised.
They implore the court through their council to direct INEC and the federal government of Nigeria to compensate them in the sum of N77 billion for what they described as their novel and innovative I-voting proposal, which according to them metamorphosed into the BIVAS and IReV.
READ ALSO: Leaders Of Thought Call For Live Broadcast Of Election Petition Cases, Judgement
“An order directing the 1st defendant and the federal government of Nigeria herein represented by the 2nd defendant to compensate the plaintiffs with the sum of N77,000,000,000.00 (seventy-seven Billion Naira) for their novel and innovative I-proposal to the 1st defendant since 2010 which birthed the BIVAS system and IREV platform of the commission.”
Obekpa, a US-based medical professional, and RNA, a pro-united Africa organisation, claimed to have proposed the E-voting system to INEC in 2010 and presented the “Renaissance I-voting Proposal for INEC” to Prof Mahmud Jega on behalf of INEC in October 2010.
“Our clients, Dr Adah Edache Obekpa and Renaissance Network Africa (RNA), firmly believe in the rights of creators to benefit from and be recognised for their innovative contributions.
“They view INEC’s actions in circumventing their pioneering I-voting proposal as a violation of these fundamental rights.
“Our legal action seeks to protect not only our client’s interests but also to uphold the principles of transparency, justice, and fair recognition for inventors and innovators.
“It is our belief that these values must be honored and defended in this matter,” the lawyer stated.
He further said that the proposal as prepared by Lawyers was given comprehensive media coverage with a special news briefing on the subject matter hosted by Obekpa at the Unity Hall of Reiz Continental Hotel, Central Business District, Abuja, on October 23, 2010.
According to Obekpa and RNA, the I-voting proposal for INEC is the same in contents, features, design, and operation as the Biometric Verification System (BIVAS) tech device and INEC online Result Viewing portal (IReV).
They however claimed that the failure of the BVAS and IReV, as well as the lack of complete transparency in the just-concluded 2023 general elections, was because of the refusal of INEC to adopt security features contained in the I-voting proposal submitted to the commission.
The plaintiffs also alleged that INEC discarded the system protocol’s transparency features, including using another iPhone as a hidden camera discreetly placed in the polling booth where the ballot box resides.
The camera can record the whole electoral process and the voters as they vote. They also disclosed that the sharing of polling unit results with political parties and the media in real-time when the results were sent to INEC’s server was not adopted by INEC.
Obekpa and RNA, therefore expressed their annoyance for neither receiving any credit from INEC for being recognised by the FGN for being the first to introduce the E-voting system to the Commission as far back as 2010.
They maintained that INEC intentionally concealed all information relating to them as originators of the idea leading to the introduction of the BVAS and IReV portals.
In their prayer before the court, they are seeking “An order directing the 1st defendant and the Federal Government of Nigeria herein represented by the 2nd defendant to publicly recognise and acknowledge the plaintiffs and their team who were involved in the preparation and design of the I-voting Proposal to the 1st defendant since 2010.
Meanwhile, both INEC and the FGN are yet to react to the allegations made against them by Obekpa and RNA.
Follow Us